AAPL
Apple
Price
$333.74
Market cap
4901.76 B
P/E
40.31
Search companies or stocks...
Apple (AAPL $4.90 trillion) is the larger company by market cap, ahead of Meta (META $1.64 trillion).
AAPL
Apple
Price
$333.74
Market cap
4901.76 B
P/E
40.31
META
Meta
Price
$646.01
Market cap
1639.85 B
P/E
19.16
| Metric | AAPL | META |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $333.74 | $646.01 |
| Market Cap | 4901.76 B | 1639.85 B |
| P/E Ratio | 40.31 | 19.16 |
| Revenue (TTM) | $30.69 | $84.83 |
| EPS | $8.28 | $33.71 |
| 52-Week Range | $201.50 – $334.98 | $520.26 – $796.25 |
| Analyst Rating | — | — |
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Price ($) | $333.74 | $646.01 |
| Market Cap (B) | 4901.76 B | 1639.85 B |
| P/E Ratio | 40.31 | 19.16 |
| Dividend Yield (TTM) | 0.31% | 0.33% |
| Volume (M) | 63.20 M | 20.97 M |
| Day High ($) | $334.98 | $652.20 |
| Day Low ($) | $329.00 | $626.00 |
| 52 Week High ($) | $334.98 | $796.25 |
| 52 Week Low ($) | $201.50 | $520.26 |
| Sector | Technology | Technology |
| Shares Outstanding (B) | 14.69 B | 2.54 B |
| Full Time Employees | 0 | 0 |
Apple Inc. (AAPL) and Meta Platforms (META) are both listed on NASDAQ or NYSE and operate in the Technology sector. Apple Inc. currently trades at $333.74 with a market capitalisation of 4901.76 B, while Meta Platforms trades at $646.01 with a market cap of 1639.85 B. Year-to-date, AAPL has returned 22.76% versus 0.00% for META.
On a price-to-earnings basis, AAPL trades at a P/E of 40.31 compared to 19.16 for META. This means AAPL carries a premium valuation relative to META, implying the market expects stronger future earnings growth from Apple Inc.. On a revenue basis, Apple Inc. generated $30.69 in trailing twelve-month revenue versus $84.83 for Meta Platforms.
Analyst ratings and price targets for AAPL and META are included in the comparison table when available from our data feed.
Choosing between AAPL and META depends on your investment objective. AAPL may suit investors seeking growth, while META may appeal to those prioritising value. Both stocks are covered extensively by Wall Street analysts — use the comparison table above to evaluate the metrics that matter most to your strategy. This is not financial advice.
AAPL has a P/E ratio of 40.31 and META has a P/E ratio of 19.16. A higher P/E typically indicates the market expects higher future earnings growth.
Meta Platforms (META) generated more revenue over the trailing twelve months, with $84.83 versus $30.69 for Apple Inc. (AAPL).
Analyst ratings and price targets for AAPL and META are included in the comparison table above when available from our data feed.
AAPL has outperformed year-to-date, returning 22.76% versus 0.00% for META.
Whether AAPL or META is the better long-term investment depends on your goals, risk tolerance, and time horizon. Compare their valuation, revenue growth, and analyst ratings in the table above. This is not financial advice.
AAPL has a market capitalisation of 4901.76 B and META has a market cap of 1639.85 B.
Live snapshot from the comparison feed—open each valuation page for fair value and upside framing.
Apple Inc. and Meta Platforms earn revenue from different products and end markets. Compare scale in market cap, profitability in the Financial tab, and sector context in the Overview table before treating the two as interchangeable.
Competitive strength shows up in returns, multiples, and volatility. Use the Performance tab for historical behavior and the company pages for narrative context: AAPL, META.
Explore fair value framing for both tickers, then adjust assumptions in the Stock Valuation Checker.
Recent return momentum in this snapshot has favored Apple Inc. (AAPL)—use fundamentals to test whether that trend looks durable.
Tie growth assumptions to segment demand and reinvestment needs, then reconcile with the multiples in the Financial tab. Pair price moves with fundamentals via the linked company and valuation pages.
Both AAPL and META can face cycle risk, margin pressure, regulation, and share-shift from competitors. Richer multiples or higher historical volatility can amplify drawdowns if growth slows—sense-check on the Performance tab and against your own tolerance.
Income-oriented readers often weigh META’s higher indicated yield in this snapshot against payout growth and coverage.
Tickerplace does not issue buy or sell instructions. Use the scenarios below as research scaffolding, then decide with your own criteria—or speak to a licensed professional.
If you prioritize revenue and earnings momentum—and accept sharper drawdowns—you may lean toward the name with stronger recent performance in this snapshot and a thesis you can support with fundamentals.
If you prioritize cash generation, payout durability, or lower cyclicality, compare margins, debt, and dividend coverage in Financials and on each company page—not price alone.
Some investors diversify across growth and quality. You might consider both names only if position sizing and correlation fit your plan.
Unlock historical valuation depth, advanced metrics, and premium screeners with Tickerplace Pro.
Unlock premium data