AMZN
Amazon
Price
$247.23
Market cap
2659.48 B
P/E
29.57
Search companies or stocks...
Amazon (AMZN $2.66 trillion) is the larger company by market cap, ahead of Walmart (WMT $909.13 billion).
AMZN
Amazon
Price
$247.23
Market cap
2659.48 B
P/E
29.57
WMT
Walmart
Price
$114.24
Market cap
909.13 B
P/E
42.31
| Metric | AMZN | WMT |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $247.23 | $114.24 |
| Market Cap | 2659.48 B | 909.13 B |
| P/E Ratio | 29.57 | 42.31 |
| Revenue (TTM) | $69.14 | $91.02 |
| EPS | $8.36 | $2.70 |
| 52-Week Range | $196.00 – $278.56 | $94.43 – $135.16 |
| Analyst Rating | — | — |
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Price ($) | $247.23 | $114.24 |
| Market Cap (B) | 2659.48 B | 909.13 B |
| P/E Ratio | 29.57 | 42.31 |
| Dividend Yield (TTM) | 0.00% | 0.84% |
| Volume (M) | 40.07 M | 22.81 M |
| Day High ($) | $250.24 | $118.09 |
| Day Low ($) | $243.59 | $113.60 |
| 52 Week High ($) | $278.56 | $135.16 |
| 52 Week Low ($) | $196.00 | $94.43 |
| Sector | Consumer Cyclical | Consumer Defensive |
| Shares Outstanding (B) | 10.76 B | 7.96 B |
| Full Time Employees | 0 | 0 |
Amazon.com (AMZN) and Walmart Inc. (WMT) are both listed on NASDAQ or NYSE and operate in the Consumer Cyclical and Consumer Defensive sectors. Amazon.com currently trades at $247.23 with a market capitalisation of 2659.48 B, while Walmart Inc. trades at $114.24 with a market cap of 909.13 B. Year-to-date, AMZN has returned 7.11% versus 2.54% for WMT.
On a price-to-earnings basis, AMZN trades at a P/E of 29.57 compared to 42.31 for WMT. This means WMT carries a premium valuation relative to AMZN, implying the market expects stronger future earnings growth from Walmart Inc.. On a revenue basis, Amazon.com generated $69.14 in trailing twelve-month revenue versus $91.02 for Walmart Inc..
Analyst ratings and price targets for AMZN and WMT are included in the comparison table when available from our data feed.
Choosing between AMZN and WMT depends on your investment objective. AMZN may suit investors seeking value, while WMT may appeal to those prioritising growth. Both stocks are covered extensively by Wall Street analysts — use the comparison table above to evaluate the metrics that matter most to your strategy. This is not financial advice.
AMZN has a P/E ratio of 29.57 and WMT has a P/E ratio of 42.31. A higher P/E typically indicates the market expects higher future earnings growth.
Walmart Inc. (WMT) generated more revenue over the trailing twelve months, with $91.02 versus $69.14 for Amazon.com (AMZN).
Analyst ratings and price targets for AMZN and WMT are included in the comparison table above when available from our data feed.
AMZN has outperformed year-to-date, returning 7.11% versus 2.54% for WMT.
Whether AMZN or WMT is the better long-term investment depends on your goals, risk tolerance, and time horizon. Compare their valuation, revenue growth, and analyst ratings in the table above. This is not financial advice.
AMZN has a market capitalisation of 2659.48 B and WMT has a market cap of 909.13 B.
Live snapshot from the comparison feed—open each valuation page for fair value and upside framing.
Amazon.com and Walmart Inc. earn revenue from different products and end markets. Compare scale in market cap, profitability in the Financial tab, and sector context in the Overview table before treating the two as interchangeable.
Competitive strength shows up in returns, multiples, and volatility. Use the Performance tab for historical behavior and the company pages for narrative context: AMZN, WMT.
Explore fair value framing for both tickers, then adjust assumptions in the Stock Valuation Checker.
Recent return momentum in this snapshot has favored Walmart Inc. (WMT)—compare revenue and margin trends on each company page before extrapolating.
Tie growth assumptions to segment demand and reinvestment needs, then reconcile with the multiples in the Financial tab. Pair price moves with fundamentals via the linked company and valuation pages.
Both AMZN and WMT can face cycle risk, margin pressure, regulation, and share-shift from competitors. Richer multiples or higher historical volatility can amplify drawdowns if growth slows—sense-check on the Performance tab and against your own tolerance.
Income-oriented readers often weigh WMT’s higher indicated yield in this snapshot against payout growth and coverage.
Tickerplace does not issue buy or sell instructions. Use the scenarios below as research scaffolding, then decide with your own criteria—or speak to a licensed professional.
If you prioritize revenue and earnings momentum—and accept sharper drawdowns—you may lean toward the name with stronger recent performance in this snapshot and a thesis you can support with fundamentals.
If you prioritize cash generation, payout durability, or lower cyclicality, compare margins, debt, and dividend coverage in Financials and on each company page—not price alone.
Some investors diversify across growth and quality. You might consider both names only if position sizing and correlation fit your plan.
Unlock historical valuation depth, advanced metrics, and premium screeners with Tickerplace Pro.
Unlock premium data