AMZN
Amazon
Price
$254.92
Market cap
2742.20 B
P/E
20.51
Search companies or stocks...
Amazon (AMZN $2.74 trillion) is the larger company by market cap, ahead of Walmart (WMT $842.92 billion).
AMZN
Amazon
Price
$254.92
Market cap
2742.20 B
P/E
20.51
WMT
Walmart
Price
$105.92
Market cap
842.92 B
P/E
39.23
| Metric | AMZN | WMT |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $254.92 | $105.92 |
| Market Cap | 2742.20 B | 842.92 B |
| P/E Ratio | 20.51 | 39.23 |
| Revenue (TTM) | $72.12 | $92.51 |
| EPS | $12.43 | $2.70 |
| 52-Week Range | $196.00 – $287.20 | $96.51 – $135.16 |
| Analyst Rating | — | — |
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Price ($) | $254.92 | $105.92 |
| Market Cap (B) | 2742.20 B | 842.92 B |
| P/E Ratio | 20.51 | 39.23 |
| Dividend Yield (TTM) | 0.00% | 0.92% |
| Volume (M) | 31.36 M | 21.97 M |
| Day High ($) | $255.82 | $106.64 |
| Day Low ($) | $251.93 | $104.66 |
| 52 Week High ($) | $287.20 | $135.16 |
| 52 Week Low ($) | $196.00 | $96.51 |
| Sector | Consumer Cyclical | Consumer Defensive |
| Shares Outstanding (B) | 10.76 B | 7.96 B |
| Full Time Employees | 0 | 0 |
Amazon.com (AMZN) and Walmart Inc. (WMT) are both listed on NASDAQ or NYSE and operate in the Consumer Cyclical and Consumer Defensive sectors. Amazon.com currently trades at $254.92 with a market capitalisation of 2742.20 B, while Walmart Inc. trades at $105.92 with a market cap of 842.92 B. Year-to-date, AMZN has returned 10.44% versus -4.93% for WMT.
On a price-to-earnings basis, AMZN trades at a P/E of 20.51 compared to 39.23 for WMT. This is a higher P/E multiple for WMT than for AMZN. A higher multiple is not a recommendation to buy or sell, and it does not by itself mean Walmart Inc. will grow faster. On a revenue basis, Amazon.com generated $72.12 in trailing twelve-month revenue versus $92.51 for Walmart Inc..
Analyst ratings and price targets for AMZN and WMT are included in the comparison table when available from our data feed.
The comparison table lists multiples and other published data for AMZN and WMT. AMZN currently has a P/E of 20.51 versus 39.23 for WMT. A lower multiple is not a recommendation to buy. Published figures for both names appear in the comparison table. Differences in those figures are not a recommendation to choose one stock over the other.
AMZN has a P/E ratio of 20.51 and WMT has a P/E ratio of 39.23. A higher P/E typically indicates the market expects higher future earnings growth.
Walmart Inc. (WMT) generated more revenue over the trailing twelve months, with $92.51 versus $72.12 for Amazon.com (AMZN).
Analyst ratings and price targets for AMZN and WMT are included in the comparison table above when available from our data feed.
AMZN has outperformed year-to-date, returning 10.44% versus -4.93% for WMT.
Tickerplace does not rank AMZN against WMT as a better or worse investment. The table lists published figures (multiples, growth, and analyst data when available) so you can compare them yourself. That is not a recommendation.
AMZN has a market capitalisation of 2742.20 B and WMT has a market cap of 842.92 B.
Live snapshot from the comparison feed—open each valuation page for fair value and upside framing.
Amazon.com and Walmart Inc. earn revenue from different products and end markets. Compare scale in market cap, profitability in the Financial tab, and sector context in the Overview table before treating the two as interchangeable.
Competitive strength shows up in returns, multiples, and volatility. Use the Performance tab for historical behavior and the company pages for narrative context: AMZN, WMT.
Explore fair value framing for both tickers, then adjust assumptions in the Stock Valuation Checker.
Recent return momentum in this snapshot has favored Amazon.com (AMZN)—use fundamentals to test whether that trend looks durable.
Tie growth assumptions to segment demand and reinvestment needs, then reconcile with the multiples in the Financial tab. Pair price moves with fundamentals via the linked company and valuation pages.
Both AMZN and WMT can face cycle risk, margin pressure, regulation, and share-shift from competitors. Richer multiples or higher historical volatility can amplify drawdowns if growth slows—sense-check on the Performance tab and against your own tolerance.
Income-oriented readers often weigh WMT’s higher indicated yield in this snapshot against payout growth and coverage.
Tickerplace does not issue buy or sell instructions. Use the scenarios below as research scaffolding, then decide with your own criteria—or speak to a licensed professional.
If you prioritize revenue and earnings momentum—and accept sharper drawdowns—you may lean toward the name with stronger recent performance in this snapshot and a thesis you can support with fundamentals.
If you prioritize cash generation, payout durability, or lower cyclicality, compare margins, debt, and dividend coverage in Financials and on each company page—not price alone.
Some investors diversify across growth and quality. You might consider both names only if position sizing and correlation fit your plan.
Unlock historical valuation depth, advanced metrics, and premium screeners with Tickerplace Pro.
Unlock premium data