MSFT
Microsoft
Price
$393.82
Market cap
2925.46 B
P/E
24.32
Search companies or stocks...
NVIDIA (NVDA $4.91 trillion) is the larger company by market cap, ahead of Microsoft (MSFT $2.93 trillion).
MSFT
Microsoft
Price
$393.82
Market cap
2925.46 B
P/E
24.32
NVDA
NVIDIA
Price
$202.81
Market cap
4912.26 B
P/E
34.73
| Metric | MSFT | NVDA |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $393.82 | $202.81 |
| Market Cap | 2925.46 B | 4912.26 B |
| P/E Ratio | 24.32 | 34.73 |
| Revenue (TTM) | $42.86 | $10.44 |
| EPS | $16.19 | $5.84 |
| 52-Week Range | $349.20 – $555.45 | $164.07 – $236.54 |
| Analyst Rating | — | — |
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Price ($) | $393.82 | $202.81 |
| Market Cap (B) | 2925.46 B | 4912.26 B |
| P/E Ratio | 24.32 | 34.73 |
| Dividend Yield (TTM) | 0.90% | 0.14% |
| Volume (M) | 32.99 M | 138.21 M |
| Day High ($) | $398.39 | $206.65 |
| Day Low ($) | $389.39 | $197.97 |
| 52 Week High ($) | $555.45 | $236.54 |
| 52 Week Low ($) | $349.20 | $164.07 |
| Sector | Technology | Technology |
| Shares Outstanding (B) | 7.43 B | 24.22 B |
| Full Time Employees | 0 | 0 |
Microsoft Corporation (MSFT) and NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) are both listed on NASDAQ or NYSE and operate in the Technology sector. Microsoft Corporation currently trades at $393.82 with a market capitalisation of 2925.46 B, while NVIDIA Corporation trades at $202.81 with a market cap of 4912.26 B. Year-to-date, MSFT has returned 0.00% versus 0.00% for NVDA.
On a price-to-earnings basis, MSFT trades at a P/E of 24.32 compared to 34.73 for NVDA. This means NVDA carries a premium valuation relative to MSFT, implying the market expects stronger future earnings growth from NVIDIA Corporation. On a revenue basis, Microsoft Corporation generated $42.86 in trailing twelve-month revenue versus $10.44 for NVIDIA Corporation.
Analyst ratings and price targets for MSFT and NVDA are included in the comparison table when available from our data feed.
Choosing between MSFT and NVDA depends on your investment objective. MSFT may suit investors seeking value, while NVDA may appeal to those prioritising growth. Both stocks are covered extensively by Wall Street analysts — use the comparison table above to evaluate the metrics that matter most to your strategy. This is not financial advice.
MSFT has a P/E ratio of 24.32 and NVDA has a P/E ratio of 34.73. A higher P/E typically indicates the market expects higher future earnings growth.
Microsoft Corporation (MSFT) generated more revenue over the trailing twelve months, with $42.86 versus $10.44 for NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA).
Analyst ratings and price targets for MSFT and NVDA are included in the comparison table above when available from our data feed.
MSFT and NVDA have similar year-to-date returns in this snapshot (0.00% vs 0.00%).
Whether MSFT or NVDA is the better long-term investment depends on your goals, risk tolerance, and time horizon. Compare their valuation, revenue growth, and analyst ratings in the table above. This is not financial advice.
MSFT has a market capitalisation of 2925.46 B and NVDA has a market cap of 4912.26 B.
Live snapshot from the comparison feed—open each valuation page for fair value and upside framing.
Microsoft Corporation and NVIDIA Corporation earn revenue from different products and end markets. Compare scale in market cap, profitability in the Financial tab, and sector context in the Overview table before treating the two as interchangeable.
Competitive strength shows up in returns, multiples, and volatility. Use the Performance tab for historical behavior and the company pages for narrative context: MSFT, NVDA.
Explore fair value framing for both tickers, then adjust assumptions in the Stock Valuation Checker.
Return profiles look comparable in this window—shift focus to growth drivers and risk using the comparison tables and linked company pages.
Tie growth assumptions to segment demand and reinvestment needs, then reconcile with the multiples in the Financial tab. Pair price moves with fundamentals via the linked company and valuation pages.
Both MSFT and NVDA can face cycle risk, margin pressure, regulation, and share-shift from competitors. Richer multiples or higher historical volatility can amplify drawdowns if growth slows—sense-check on the Performance tab and against your own tolerance.
Income-oriented readers often weigh MSFT’s higher indicated yield in this snapshot against payout growth and coverage.
Tickerplace does not issue buy or sell instructions. Use the scenarios below as research scaffolding, then decide with your own criteria—or speak to a licensed professional.
If you prioritize revenue and earnings momentum—and accept sharper drawdowns—you may lean toward the name with stronger recent performance in this snapshot and a thesis you can support with fundamentals.
If you prioritize cash generation, payout durability, or lower cyclicality, compare margins, debt, and dividend coverage in Financials and on each company page—not price alone.
Some investors diversify across growth and quality. You might consider both names only if position sizing and correlation fit your plan.
Unlock historical valuation depth, advanced metrics, and premium screeners with Tickerplace Pro.
Unlock premium data